Patients (n=79) were randomised to SYLVANT® (n=53) or placebo (n=26) and treated until treatment failure (disease progression based on increase in symptoms, radiologic progression or deterioration in performance status) or unacceptable toxicity (Figure 6).6,7
For inclusion, patients had to:6-8
Patients could be newly diagnosed or previously treated, except those who had previously received IL-6 targeted treatment.
Patients were excluded if they:
The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who achieved durable tumour and symptomatic response (as assessed by an independent radiology review) defined as either a complete response or a partial response for at least 18 weeks. There was no validated criteria to evaluate iMCD. As iMCD is lymphoproliferative, the modified Cheson criteria were used (as they can be used to evaluate lymph nodes), however the criteria were adjusted to include the assessment of cutaneous lesions caused by iMCD.
Symptoms were scored using the MCD-related overall symptom score, which is the sum of the severity grades of MCD-related signs and symptoms. The percentage change from baseline in MCD-related signs and symptoms and MCD-related overall symptom score at each cycle was calculated.6 A complete response was defined as a 100% reduction from baseline in the MCD-related overall symptoms score.
Key secondary endpoints included:7,8
Figure 6: Study design
* Treatment failure was defined as sustained increase in grade ≥2 disease-related symptoms persisting ≥3 weeks; new disease-related grade ≥3 symptoms; sustained >1 paint increase in ECOG-PS persisting for ≥3 weeks; radiological progression by modified Cheson criteria or initiation of another treatment for iMCD. At 1st treatment failure, patients in the placebo arm could crossover to receive open-label Sylvant® (+ best supportive care) until second treatment failure.
References